5 Steps To Set Clear Expectations

Why is setting expectations important?  If your staff know what is expected of them, it allows them to focus on results and to monitor themselves against the set standards.  Environments in which expectations are not clear, or change from week to week, seldom create high-performing work groups.


The following are five steps to use to set and communicate clear expectations:

1) Focus on Outcomes; 2) Define Roles; 3) Monitor; 4) Provide Feedback; and 5) Reinforce.

1. Focus on Outcomes.  Expectations should focus on outcomes, not activities. In other words, you achieve clarity when you identify the expected results rather than the method for achieving them. Managers often make the mistake of attempting to direct the process that staff will use rather than being clear about results.

Defining the objective often requires some thought on the part of the manager because it is easy to fall into the "activities trap".

2. Define Roles. Clearly outlining and explaining the role of each team member, including key job responsibilities, is necessary at the outset. When setting expectations for staff, it is important to define your own role as a leader as well. Explicitly state that you expect to be a resource, if you want them to know that you are available to assist with problems.
 
3. Monitor. Monitoring is the follow-up that the manager provides after expectations have been set. It can take many forms, from a formal status-review meeting to a casual conversation in the hallway. Regardless of the form, monitoring is the component that indicates that the project or assignment is important to you as a manager and that you are interested in its outcome. It enables you to assess the progress and assist if unexpected roadblocks emerge.

4. Feedback.  Feedback is the process of communicating what is working well and what needs improvement. Focus on progress, any course corrections that may be required, and the subordinate's view of the project. It is key to allow employees to debrief their experience. As the leader, you will be in a better position to evaluate not only their progress, but also what future responsibilities they may be able to undertake.

5. Reinforcement.  Rewards or consequences come into play to provide either positive or negative reinforcement.

Certainly, you want to reward a positive outcome. Rewards can take a number of forms, but regardless of the type, they should be timely, specific, and relevant to the employee. Consequences also should be timely and specific while focusing on how the employee can improve performance.

While giving negative feedback often is uncomfortable for many managers, on-the-job behavior is shaped by both circumstances and consequences. If there is no downside to poor performance, it is difficult for managers to raise the performance bar for any of their staff.

How to Choose Engaged Team Members

As a leader, you may often wonder how to make a decision between two capable employees about which one to hire or retain.

 

I have a racing sailing team and my criteria for selecting those team members is the same as the criteria I have used for hiring (and firing) employees. Here are 3 key characteristics to look for when assessing who you want to have on your team:

1. Commitment. People who are truly committed are consistently present and engaged. They show up fully. They have their heads in the game 100%. You can sense when people are truly dedicated in this way; and, on the flipside, when they are not. Trust your intuition in assessing someone’s level of engagement.

2. Fit. People with complementary strengths form the best team, and may provide a healthy source of conflict. Rather than a homogeneous group of people, having differing opinions and attitudes will create a stronger contribution to the whole. At the same time, you want team members who play well together, to minimize the destructive potential of conflict. Also:

• Consider culture (the way we work around here) and values (what’s really important to us) and how your team member will fit in within that framework.
• Assess the individual’s personality and how well it fits the job.

3. Skill and Aptitude. Of course, you want people who have the ability to do their job. Although, I have engaged team members who did not have 100% of the requirements for the job, but had the aptitude and desire to learn and bridge the gaps. As long as you sense a good fit and high level of commitment, know that attitude and personality often weigh more in the long term since these attributes are inherent in individuals and not learned traits.

• Wouldn’t it be preferable to have someone who shows up consistently, plays well with others and is growing into their role, than someone who is capable of doing the job but is consistently absent and is destructively confrontational with others?

When I am choosing a team member for my sailing team, I assess the racers with these 3 attributes. Commitment and fit are as important as skill and aptitude. Whether you are selecting a new team member, a new board member, or making a difficult decision to let someone go, consider these 3 attributes to assist your decision making.

How do you assess these 3 characteristics? Communication, through active listening, questioning, while focusing on understanding others and always, always, maintaining respect.

5 Tips for Working Successfully in a Group

In Randy Pausch's "Last Lecture", he shared some valuable advice for working well with other people in a group:


Find things you have in common. You can almost always find something in common with another person, and from there, it's much easier to address issues where you have differences.  Sports cut across boundaries of race and wealth. And if nothing else, we all have the weather in common.

Try for optimal meeting conditions. Make sure no one is hungry, cold or tired.  Meet over a meal if you can; food softens a meeting.  That's why they "do lunch" in Hollywood.

Let everyone talk. Don't finish someone's sentences.  And talking louder or faster doesn't make your ideas any better.

Check egos at the door. When you discuss ideas, label them and write them down.  The label should be descriptive of the idea, not the originator: "the bridge story" not "Jane's story."

Praise each other. Find something nice to say, even if it's a stretch.  The worst ideas can have silver linings if you look hard enough. (A related piece of advice: Look for the best in everybody. If you wait long enough, people will surprise and impress you.)

Phrase alternatives as questions. Instead of "I think we should do A, not B," try "What if we did A, instead of B?" That allows people to offer comments rather than defend one choice.